The Fifth Circuit methodically assists in crimes and crime cover-ups and shamefully lies to the public
Corrupt circuit judges -- Higginbotham, Higginson, and Duncan -- fabricate a 100% fraudulent, deceitful, and falsified "opinion" in order to block access to courts and protect the criminals it favors.
If you are a true journalist (unlike 99.9% of the malicious frauds, planted by your government in order to brainwash the public and control the narrative by suppressing true stories of the truly shocking government misconduct), please help bring this to public attention.
What the public, brainwashed by the bogus “journslism,” does not recognize is that what the Fifth Circuit has maliciously done is a CRIME.
The courts work closely with corrupt governments and corporations. To avoid “reaching” just and prescribed by the law decision that goes against the criminal agenda of the corrupt — they deceive, distort the facts, and disregard the law. They do that in secrecy — psst! — and conceal public records from the public. Then, they carefully manufacture a fraudulent word-salad that is meant to confuse, create cognitive dissonance, and pass as legitimate whereas in reality is a total sham. To prevent me from suing the dirty governments for barbaric violations of my clearly established constitutional rights and other criminal acts that is exactly what the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit has done.
How it all started:
I was physically attacked and injured by the psychopath that pretended to be my dating partner. He worked (and apparently still works) for Louisiana department of “justice.” I reported a crime to Baton Rouge police department and for over a year tried to make the policemen-criminals to accept evidence, properly document it, investigate, and charge the perpetrator with the crime. The corrupt policemen falsified the records and would not allow me to obtain a copy of that public record for over eight months. I was filing public record requests but an attorney that I hired to assist me was working in tandem with the corrupt public officials and quietly closing the requests behind my back and lying to me that I must not seek any public records otherwise the attacker would “never be convicted.” Notably, shortly after that attorney proved her criminal-mindedness, she was “promoted” and now works for Louisiana department of “justice.”
In eight months of trying to get the police file through public record request, I unexpectedly obtained a copy of that file that the dirty cops would not release to me through the third party. It was shockingly falsified – not surprisingly the criminals did not want to give it to me. I went up the chain of command and contacted everyone in Baton Rouge police department pointing to the falsities in the report, requesting to review my case, and charge with the crime the bastard who injured me. I started with the gormless “detective” to whom my case was purportedly assigned and then contacted several other scumbags, including chief of police. In response, I was either blatantly lied to and abused or entirely ignored.
I then attempted to obtain a protective order against the batterer and witnessed an outrageous corruption among the “judges”-criminals and all staff of the nineteenth judicial district court of Louisiana.
I contacted Louisiana department of “justice,” including the filthy scumbag Landry, requesting that he reviews the case where an “investigation” was faked and falsified and brings his employee to justice. No response has been ever provided by that scumbag.
I also contacted – for the fourth time – the district attorney of the nineteenth judicial district of Louisiana. All three previous communication attempts were ignored but that fourth one sent specifically with signature confirmation was “answered.” Although I requested a response in writing, an assistant district attorney called me and in a casual manner chirped that she wants to “chat” with me. By that time, I was already entirely exhausted and fed up with the corrupt scumbags that I had been tirelessly contacting for over a year and sending official letters, evidence, fighting to be able to simply review public records – all to no avail. Immediately sensing deception to which by that time I had already grown accustomed, I said that I am not interested in “chatting.” I sent a serious correspondence, demanding that criminal charges that were long overdue be filed against the batterer on the basis of available evidence.
After ending that phone call and thinking about how that filthy assistant district attorney Melanie Fields tried to manipulate and convince me to stop seeking justice and cease my attempts to make the corrupt law enforcement to follow the law, I realized that the police, the district attorney office, the corrupt state courts (also here, and here), and the criminals of the Louisiana department of justice conspired to cover up the crimes, committed against me and all that purported investigation and everything that happened in the past year was a complete sham and masquerade.
I then composed and sent an email to Fields, telling her that if she chooses to join the crime cover ups, I will try to expose not only “the criminals that run Baton Rouge police department and Louisiana department of justice” but also the district attorney’s office.
The persecution has ensued:
I sent that email on December 4, 2018. Immediately, the criminals (and here) took control over all electronic accounts that I had. I created a separate protonmail account and contacted over a dozen of supposed “investigative journalists.” The criminals instantly took control over that protonmail, enabled password reset, changed the password, and enabled daily notifications of all emails to their email address. I was unable to access that account and see if anyone responded to me. (Considering that the so-called “investigative journalism” is another hoax, almost entirely dominated by the controlled opposition, it is most likely that no one responded. However, the criminals clearly did not want to take a chance).
The information that I posted on my blog was partially removed and the blog was made “invisible” and did not appear in the search results at all.
I never had any social media but at that time tried to create the accounts and they all were immediately deactivated. At that time, the intrusion and tyrannical control by those criminals was truly scary and barbaric. Later, after I tried to voice my concerns and attract attention to it, they adopted a more sophisticated, ghost-like manner of the absolute control and surveillance.
Attack in the “medical” office:
On December 11, 2018 – just in 7 days after I made the statement of my willingness to expose their corruption, I have been attacked in a purported “medical” office and injected with a corrosive-like substance that partially dissolved my eyelids. That was my first time visiting a purported “ophthalmologist” – I never had any issues with my eyes (or with my overall health at that time). It was just horrible and when I went to seek help elsewhere (and here) such as to remove scars on my eyelids that were caused by that vicious attack, no charlatan wanted to diagnose me. The so-called medical board never investigated and I was not permitted by the criminals to sue filthy Small.
All that will be addressed in a separate publication in order not to lose focus of the main topic of this post.
On around December 11, 2018, my beloved Dog has been also mysteriously injured – I will write about it as well.
Secretly and quietly “discharged” from work, unable to work from home due to malicious interferences, unable to live in peace:
Around December 18, 2018, I was quietly and without any explanation “discharged” from Louisiana state university where I worked at that time.
Suddenly, I was unable to work from home either because someone would cut off my internet, block my devices at the router point, change the password on my network – exactly at the times when I needed to be online to maintain my employment. I changed several routers trying to make them more secure, called the internet provider numerous times – all to no avail.
The manner of control and barbaric censorship at that time was terrifying – they simply were not trying to hide it at all and apparently wanted to scare me into silence and compliance.
Because I knew that I have the constitutional right to be protected from crimes and persecution under color of law, barbaric unlawful censorship, discrimination on the basis of national origin and gender, and unlawful searches and seizures of my personal property – I started drafting a complaint that I intended to file in a federal court and request that the criminals that have been after me be enjoined from continuing with their criminal acts.
To minimize unlawful eavesdropping, I was drafting my complaint by hand.
Welcome to the United States court for the middle district of Louisiana – the den of evil and the filthy swamp:
On January 25, 2019, I went to that courthouse and attempted to file my complaint. They did not want to accept it and first read it for nearly an hour. Then they told me that it “must be filed under seal.” That means that those unscrupulous public officials that operate jointly with the dirty “law enforcement” criminals wanted to entirely cover up the events I was talking about, entirely suppress my speech, and entirely conceal from the public that they were about to mishandle and suppress my legal action. I protested to my action being “sealed” and they finally filed it.
It was “assigned” to chief judge, Dick (what an aptronym! Always makes me think about Chekhov’s “A Horsey Name.”). Dick promptly threw out my emergency motion where I asked to restrain defendants from tampering with my electronic devices, removing my writings from the internet, physically harming me, and otherwise violating my constitutional rights. Thereafter, she suppressed the lawsuit such as it was not possible to prosecute it, issue summons, or do anything at all as it was artificially and unlawfully suffocated in direct violation of the Federal Rules and the Supreme Court’s law.
Because corrupt Dick blocked my access to courts, I decided to dismiss my suit in accordance with the applicable Federal Rules and then refile, which I clearly indicated. However, Dick – in a truly shocking violation of the rules and the law – “dismissed” my action “with prejudice.” I appealed and on November 19, 2019, the Fifth Circuit reversed Dick, ordering it to enter a correct order of dismissal so that I can refile my legal action.
The persecution by the criminals continues: physical attacks and attacks with chemical weapons
While my action was on appeal for over eight months, I was unable to refile my lawsuit. During that time, the criminals continued attacking me (note that should filthy Dick had not unlawfully suppressed my suit, the law enforcement criminals could have been stopped from further harming me — that is, if the courts and all criminal agencies were not working in tandem).
The poisoning of myself and my two wonderful and incredibly loved Golden Labradors deserves a separate post which will be produced in time. Here, I will only note that the consequences of the attacks have been devastating and that I was trying to stop them by using the law and legal methods but the criminals of the nineteenth judicial district court of Louisiana and this rabid-criminal — the “chief judge” Wilson Fields — while advancing their dirty dealings in close symbiotic relationship with the scumbags Landry, Paul, and truly hundreds of various other puppets-criminals — had entirely barricaded my access to courts — in shocking violation of the law.
To cover up their crimes and the extent of damage those rabid criminals have inflicted on me and my family, the scumbags have been secretly sabotaging our access to medical care, destroying evidence, falsifying records, etc.
All that will be addressed in other posts.
The second attempt to defend my constitutional rights is again suppressed by the middle district of Louisiana:
After middle district of Louisiana was reversed, I was able to refile my action. Not surprisingly, the corrupt to the core public officials were not going to follow the law for the second time either. That time, however, instead of blatantly suppressing and burying my action, they chose to simulate the proceedings and pervert the law, procedure, and facts. Because the bastards did not like the strong factual allegations, presented in my complaint and because the law does not authorize them to dismiss a well-pleaded civil rights complaint, the filthy scumbags simply fraudulently claimed that my complaint is “frivolous.”
There is a clearly defined by the Supreme Court standard of “frivolity” which is entirely inapplicable to my meritorious case. Because the criminals and bootlickers of the dirty law enforcement have no respect for the law and the truth, the entire charade that they masqueraded is shocking.
The bootlicker of the corrupt “law enforcement” magistrate Wilder-Doomes was instructed to manufacture a false “report” and pervert the facts that I provided in my complaint as well as pervert the applicable law and procedure. The unscrupulous officials claimed that they need to “screen” my complaint using an inapplicable procedure that had been enacted to handle the petitions of uneducated prisoners that cannot write, cannot make legal arguments, and need to “verbalize” their complaints. My 105-page complaint, oversaturated with truthful factual narrative that has been drafted to ensure that no scumbag could possibly lawfully dispose of it prior to the requested jury trial did not need any “verbalization,” and in accordance with the law could not be subjected to any “screening.”
In order to corruptly misuse a prisoner-screening process on the meritorious complaint of a civilian, the middle district of Louisiana did not allow me to pay the filing fee. That’s right – I would mail them a cashier’s check and they would return it, accompanied by fraudulent, deceitful letters:
Although the correct amount of the filing fee was $402, since they claimed that it should be $400, I promptly replaced the check, and mailed them another cashier’s check for $400:
As you can see, they returned it, claiming that $402 was the correct amount and that I should try again.
There was no mistake as I specifically raised that issue through an official request for clarification and the middle district’s judges responded that they will “not permit” me to pay the filing fee.
Importantly, it does not matter whether they could lawfully “screen” my complaint (no, they couldn’t) or whether it is normal not to accept the filing fee from the litigant and preclude the litigant from commencing and prosecuting her legal action (no, it is unlawful for the federal court to outrageously lie, barricade access to courts to anyone, and exert tyrannical “power” in violation of the law) — they still could not dismiss my complaint as the law does not authorize them to do so and provides clear guidelines which those dishonest and corrupt public officials intentionally violated.
This post intends to show that the corrupt courts operate in tandem with each other and various criminal governments and its puppets. The federal court of appeal has an obligation to review and correct errors of law and fact, pointed out to it. Instead, being just another tool, operated by the criminal governments and corporations for the purpose of advancing despicable dealings, it often helps cement whichever unlawfulness had been already done.
Although in my 55-page appellant brief I convincingly demonstrated that the judges of the middle district of Louisiana grossly violated the clearly established law; have been preventing me from accessing courts — for years! — and preventing me from suing their friends — the defendants in my complaint; have been working as “advocates” for the defendants and should have been unquestionably disqualified when I requested it; have been corruptly lying, perverting the procedure, the facts that I provided, and misapplying the law to the facts — the three
musketeers scumbags of the Fifth Circuit, by their 2-page sham-opinion have once again proved that the courts (i.e., “judgeships”) get filled with the criminals in order to carry out corrupt agendas and that one should not expect to see any integrity or respect for the law in those individuals.
The Fifth Circuit hides judicial public records from the public so that the public would not get wise to its unlawful dealings:
Don’t be fooled by a few “precedents” that they have carefully manufactured and published in order to deceive the public — the precedent might be just and fair, but the clowns “forget” about it when they “rule” on the matters of the “disfavored” individuals. When they are firmly reminded about the precedents — like I reminded them in my 55-page brief — they would first ensure that there is no record available for the public to examine so that the public would be unable to spot deception. They would simply hide the public records or restrict access to those documents, and then unleash their corrupt hostility, perverting the law and raping the lady justice.
Briefs and other documents, filed with the court are judicial public records. That means they must be available for the public view — that is, according to those courts’ own preaching:
“Judicial records are public records. And public records, by definition, presume public access. The presumption of openness is Law 101: "The public's right of access to judicial records is a fundamental element of the rule of law." Openness is also Civics 101. The Constitution's first three words make clear that ultimate sovereignty is wielded not by government but by the governed. And because "We the People" are not meant to be bystanders, the default expectation is transparency—that what happens in the halls of government happens in public view. Americans cannot keep a watchful eye, either in capitols or in courthouses, if they are wearing blindfolds.
Providing public access to judicial records is the duty and responsibility of the Judicial Branch." Why is this important? Because accessibility enhances legitimacy, the assurance that things are on the level. Article III courts are independent, and it is "particularly because they are independent" that the access presumption is so vital—it gives the federal judiciary "a measure of accountability," in turn giving the public "confidence in the administration of justice." Put simply, protecting the public's right of access is "important to maintaining the integrity and legitimacy of an independent Judicial Branch." And hopefully, more access to judicial records means more trust in judicial officers and more respect for judicial orders.” Binh Hoa Le v. Exeter Fin. Corp., 990 F.3d 410, 417 (5th Cir. 2021).
In order to blindfold the public and ensure that “Americans cannot keep a watchful eye” on its dealings, and in order to avoid any accountability but instead trick the public into believing that “things are on the level” and fraudulently instill “confidence in the administration of justice” into the public mind, the Fifth Circuit did this:
Neither my brief nor the record excerpts are available to be viewed by the public. If one clicks on the “locked” brief or the “locked” record excerpts, a pop-up would appear, advising that a member of the public does not have the right to access judicial public record:
Timing is everything:
The standard time for a turnaround of an appeal in the Fifth Circuit from the close of the briefing until final disposition is around 5.3 months. How come it manufactured its deceitful sham-opinion in just 2.2 months? I know exactly why — the corrupt courts and corrupt governments operate in tandem and lots of conniving and coordinating take place in their unlawful dealings. Here, that prematurely produced laughable 2-page “opinion” had been manufactured to coincide with another unlawful dealing about which I will make a separate post later. For now, I am simply demonstrating that even the timing is off and suspect.
The Fifth Circuit turns blind and deaf when I show it that the middle district of Louisiana has been maliciously and chronically barricading my access to courts and corruptly protecting its “friends,” sued in my action:
Note that after concealing and hiding the public records — my original filings — the Fifth Circuit, instead of “affirming” the criminal mishandling of my civil rights action(s) by its lower flunkies, shamelessly lies that my brief is insufficient and I simply purportedly failed to properly bring any issues to its attention.
musketeers scumbags (here, here, and here) — or, to be precise, their staff attorney whom they instructed what kind of false, corrupt nonsense to scribble and then simply rubber stamped that gibberish — as a tactic of handling my appeal chose discrediting and attacking me whereas I have been already attacked and abused by the lower court and that’s why appealed. Despite their false claims, my arguments are well presented — in terms of efficiency and sufficiency. But because those public officials do not like the truth and do not want to reach the just decision as the law prescribes, they simply falsely claimed that I failed to present “any non-frivolous arguments on appeal.”
This post was not written for the purpose of seeking anyone’s approval or bragging about my *supposed* legal acumen. I could not care less what anyone thinks about me. But I want to show you just how false the attacks on the legitimacy of my brief and my arguments by those bastards are, and that they used their false claims simply in order to unlawfully mishandle my appeal. They followed a predetermined criminal and corrupt agenda, and be my brief even ten times better than it already is, the result would be exactly the same. Not a tiny portion of their fabrication and simulation of the proceedings is true to the law and facts, and has been manufactured in order to oppress, abuse, and cover up crimes.
They made it difficult as liars and frauds always throw at the public confusing word-salad, indirectly introduce some half-truths, and cunningly manage to say absolutely nothing of the substance but — as it sadly often happens — still succeed in deceiving the gullible and poorly informed. With something as specific as the law and when a considerable amount of labor has been put by those shameful public officials (this, this, and this) into the manufacturing of their deceitful statements — in order to confuse and create an appearance of some legitimacy of their fraudulent “opinion” — it is especially difficult but I’ll try anyway.
Abuse by middle district of Louisiana, its denial of access to courts, its open “advocacy” for the defendants, and unlawful mishandling of my legal action:
The cornerstone of my argument on appeal was a multiyear abuse and barricading of access to courts by the middle district of Louisiana which shamelessly has been working as an “advocate” for the defendants with whom it has close relationships. The law is very clear that it is unconstitutional and unacceptable for a judge who has a personal interest in the outcome of the proceeding to handle the case. Moreover, if the litigant is convinced that the judge is prejudiced against her and incapable of impartial judgement, that litigant is also entitled to have that judge removed. Things like a snarky comment towards the litigant could be a sufficient reason for disqualification. See Lund v. Cowan, No. 20-55764 (9th Cir. Jul. 15, 2021) (the judge made an insulting comment about the plaintiff and it was found that he “cannot handle Lund’s probate matter again at any point in the future, and an opinion declaring that [the judge] acted unconstitutionally would be advisory.”).
Of course, if the judge shamelessly perverts the law, facts, and procedure in order to simulate the proceedings and “reach” a corrupt result and has the defendants’ best interest in mind, that judge’s handling of the case is certainly unconstitutional.
In my 55-page brief I responsibly and fully briefed all those issues, with references to record on appeal and by citing numerous the Supreme Court’s and the federal circuits’ precedents directly on point. The corrupt Fifth Circuit judges “unsee” all that, and just once in a footnote make a deceitful comment that is meant to “neutralize” a couple dozen of pages of the dense, focused briefing that concerns all those issues:
Those unscrupulous judges (this, this, and this) claim that I argue that the middle district of Louisiana clowns “were biased” against me. If you check my brief (attached at the end of this post), you’ll see that not once did I use the word “biased.” To characterize the district judges and their acts that I describe in detail, I use the words: “hostile,” “antagonistic,” “corrupt” or “corruptly” (used 15 times).
And here we go again with Liteky v. United which I addressed in my brief:
Liteky v. United talks about actual, real judicial rulings that are based on evidence. The middle district of Louisiana scumbags artificially suffocated my legal action because they are afraid of evidence and the truth. Those corrupt rats had to pervert the procedure, the law, the facts — they did not even allow me to pay the filing fee which in itself is outrageous.
I demonstrated all of that to the Fifth Circuit, including the extent of perversion of the facts and the law — there are dozens of pages that convincingly show that the acts of the filthy middle district of Louisiana’s judges are not just inappropriate and unlawful — they are criminal. See 18 U.S.C. § 242. The criminals of the Fifth Circuit, after hiding the actual documents from the public, dispose of my valid concerns and arguments through a casual false claim in passing, in a footnote, by claiming that they “find no merit” in the clearly pointed out violations of the law.
I showed that the middle district of Louisiana corrupt judges engaged in much more than “bias.” Note that a bogus, 2-page sham-opinion of the Fifth Circuit conveniently unsees that. On the pages 9-11 (see the full brief, attached below), I explained that I was being discriminated and persecuted by the Louisiana law enforcement, and that is why I filed my first legal action (the one that malicious Dick unlawfully threw out and then the Fifth Circuit reversed in 2019, allowing me to refile my complaint), and page 12 continues on saying:
That portion of the brief unequivocally shows that what Dick has done is not any “judicial ruling” or “judicial bias” but a tyrannical criminal madness which the middle district of Louisiana’s scumbags are ashamed to admit and had been lying about, claiming that they were not reversed but voluntarily, in about eight months and coincidentally on the same day the order of reversal had been issued by the appellate court, “changed their minds” and decided to follow the law and “grant” me dismissal without prejudice so that I can refile my complaint which they unlawfully threw out.
All that has been demonstrated to the Fifth Circuit through the documents in the record excerpts. See also Figure 14 where, on page 27, I quote the exact three deceptive middle district’s comments that it was repeating again and again. And see Figures 15 and 16 which are the documents that show that middle district of Louisiana most certainly was reversed. Think about it — the federal judges that openly lie even about the indisputable facts. The filthy scumbags have no traces of integrity or honesty whatsoever.
After I showed that I had been literally precluded from meaningfully accessing courts and literally thrown out of the courtroom before I had a chance to actually enter it, and had to wait for almost a year for the Fifth Circuit’s reversal prior to being able to refile my action, I went on showing that the middle district of Louisiana — in conspiracy with their friends, sued in my legal action — continued lying, violating the law, and assisting in crimes and crime cover-ups:
Although the middle district of Louisiana certainly simulated the proceedings, simulated an inapplicable “screening” — as has been stated above, it really is not important because whether it could pretend to be “screening” my complaint and whether it were acceptable, it still violated the law because it did not adhere to the process of that purported screening, it lied about the contents of the “hearing,” and unlawfully removed the transcript of the proceeding from the record which I tried to add to the record so that I can challenge yet another middle district of Louisiana’s falsity.
The transcript is part of the record as a matter of law but the Fifth Circuit that conceals the truth and falsifies documents refused to make the middle district of Louisiana to add the transcript to the record — all that has been briefed in my appellant brief in detail with references to the Federal Rules. Because the Fifth Circuit, while manufacturing its falsification — a 2-page word-salad specifically focused on it — in order to avoid the real issues — I will touch on it again in this post.
In order to finish with that Fifth Circuit’s footnote (Figure 7) and move to the next Fifth Circuit’s falsity in its 2-page sham-opinion, I will address whether middle district of Louisiana perverted any facts in my complaint, which the Fifth Circuit claims (Figure 7) it “could not see.”
The image below (Figure 12) represents the portion of my brief where I point out the first falsity of the middle district of Louisiana’s corrupt “conclusions”: it claimed that my entire action was about police falsifying the criminal investigation of the batterer and falsifying public records. However, this is false, and my civil rights action is about the persecution by the dirty law enforcement that has ensued when I stated that I would try to expose their corruption:
Note that Figure 12 also gives a glimpse into that word-salad and confusion that middle district’s scumbags had intentionally manufactured and the filthy Fifth Circuit corruptly supported. Although the criminals claim that my legal action was dismissed as “frivolous,” they also made a false claim in passing regarding the statute of limitations. Note that snobbish “construed liberally” by the scumbags that corruptly perverted my entire argument, the entire procedural history, and the facts:
The law is clear that when a litigant faces legal impediments such as when corrupt governments prevent one from prosecuting the meritorious legal claim or in any way hinders or thwarts the attempts of the individual to access courts and justice, the statute of limitations does not run. See Una A. Kim, Government Corruption and the Right of Access to Courts, 103 MICH. L. REV. 554 (2004).
It also does not run when the action is pending somewhere, when the statute of limitations has been tolled or interrupted, or when the continuing violation doctrine applies – coincidentally, all that is applicable to my action and I carefully presented in my appellant brief:
Note that for every argument I make in my brief, I link it to record on appeal (ROA with numbers in footnotes or in the body of the brief), which means that all those arguments have been presented to the district court and are officially part of the record. I also make references to that record to show that I cited more legal authorities in my filings with the district court, I just cannot cite them all in the brief because it has a very specific word count limitation and the Fifth Circuit would not allow me to go over that limit.
It is clear that filthy Dick blocked my access to courts in violation of the law. Dick maliciously had made it impossible for me to prosecute my action.
I filed my legal action on January 25, 2019 and was unable to either prosecute or refile it until at least November 19, 2019 – for nearly a year until the Fifth Circuit reversed Dick for the first time. See Figure 13, page 26. And see page 27 which shows the lies, manufactured by the cocksucker Wilder-Doomes, who, while kissing asses of all the district judges she works for and those of the defendants such as Landry, Paul, and other so-called “law enforcement” falsely claimed that “initial order of dismissal of that action was subsequently amended to be without prejudice, per Plaintiff’s request.” Note that all those documents to which I make references in my brief are in the record excerpts (the Fifth Circuit hid it from the public as well – see Figure 3) and have been carefully and methodically demonstrated to the Fifth Circuit. And here are the documents themselves:
The Fifth Circuit reversed Dick on November 19, 2019, and ordered it to enter a correct order of dismissal, which Dick did, on November 19, 2019:
Not only the middle district of Louisiana falsely claims that it is purportedly not “prejudiced” against me (and should be “allowed” to handle my legal action and not be disqualified) because, as it shamelessly lies, it purportedly were not reversed after it, in an episode of authoritarian madness, blocked my access to courts and then entirely disregarded the Federal Rules and the precedents and threw out my legal action. But the scumbags also pretend to “not understand” that because they maliciously prevented me from prosecuting my action, the statute of limitations was not running as the law that I cited in my brief clearly explains.
I also carefully explained in my brief that the malfeasance by the criminals has never ceased, and made references to the record on appeal where I discuss it in detail. There was no need to go into the specifics of it in the brief as my action was NOT dismissed on any statute of limitations but under the guise of “frivolity under section 1915” and there was simply no room for a more detailed discussion (remember, the Fifth Circuit will not let me go over the word count limit). There are also numerous pages in my record on appeal where I discussed in detail, with many references to the applicable federal and state law, how that statute of limitations, even if ever had begun to run, has been repeatedly tolled and interrupted. All that has been briefed sufficiently although it is not the essence of my brief as my action was thrown out based on a different, completely inapplicable to it and artificially manufactured “theory.”
Importantly, the Fifth Circuit falsely claims that it is the cornerstone of my argument – see their one-line deceptive and dismissive comment in Figure 13. They entirely ignored dozens of pages on that subject that I argued about but maliciously make their dumb, deceptive “comment” in passing – in conspiracy with the public officials that I am suing and in attempt to thwart my future attempts of meaningfully accessing courts.
Once again – lots of criminal conniving and dancing around the words went into that empty, false 2-page sham that they have manufactured in order to oppress and simulate the proceedings. Note, the cowards nevertheless avoid affirming clearly unlawful and criminal dealings and perversions of the law and fact. Instead, they lie that I failed to make an argument and falsely label my appeal “frivolous,” which cannot be farther from the truth.
The corrupt Fifth Circuit judges lied that they could not find any perversion and misapprehension of the facts by the filthy middle district of Louisiana judges, see Figure 7. In addition to what has been already demonstrated, there are other facts that have been presented in my brief:
Although my complaint is packed with clearly presented facts of the conspiracy between various dirty governments, filthy middle district of Louisiana (LAMD) shamelessly lied that I purportedly said that my “allegations were given consideration on several different levels.” Wilder-Doomes and Degravelles could “not see” 105 pages, detailing corruption whereas I was entirely ignored, lied to, and abused by no matter to which corrupt “level” I was trying to bring my concerns.
Further, I demonstrated a specific – one of the many – false claim by filthy Wilder-Doomes that the dirty cop to whom my case was purportedly assigned to “investigate” could not have “a motive to engage in a coverup” and whether it even knew the batterer. The law is very clear that it is not the place of some filthy judge to try to make such conclusions sua sponte. That is, the law says that some judge cannot simply falsely claim that it “cannot see a motive” and dismiss the case on that basis, and I will address that law that I fully briefed on my appeal at the end of this post.
Importantly, I specifically stated that the attacker-degenerate personally knew the dirty cop, and specifically demonstrated all those facts. At the early stages of litigation prior to when actual evidence could be introduced, the judge is bound to “believe” that all facts, asserted in the complaint are true.
The bottom line – the filthy magistrate Wilder-Doomes manufactured a pack of lies that are contrary to my facts and the law, I carefully pointed out those outrageous instances of outright deception, but the Fifth Circuit’s corrupt judges deliberately and maliciously ignored it, discredited me (claiming that my appeal is frivolous and presented no arguments), and literally assisted or attempted to assist the filthy criminals in their crimes and crime cover-ups.
After analyzing several clear deliberate misapprehensions of the facts by the middle district of Louisiana’s criminals, with over a dozen of references to the record – meaning that the documents that I cite are all in front of the Fifth Circuit and had been presented and argued at the district court’s level as well – I stated that there are even more examples of such misapprehension and perversion of the facts but I could not include them all because they are so numerous:
That was the only place in my brief where I stated that because the examples are so numerous – it took me 90 pages to object to all those falsities with the district court – I state that I incorporate the particular pages of the record into that portion of my brief.
Note how the scumbags that deliberately ignored everything that I argued about, corruptly took this phrase out of context to use as an excuse and a purported explanation for the criminal acts and omissions of maliciously disregarding my appeal and fraudulently labeling my meritorious appeal “frivolous”:
I can assure you that I know the rules very well, and I religiously (while being a passionate anti-theist) briefed – and overbriefed – absolutely everything that had to be briefed – I would not voluntarily give the scumbags a reason to prevent me from succeeding on my appeal (Note that the bastards manufactured a false “reason” and still corruptly achieved their criminal goal).
In other words, even if that court would not take into consideration all those “extras” and various things that I simply could not put into my brief because of the word limitation, imposed by the Fifth Circuit, and simply mentioned them and linked to the record on appeal (which is actually entirely permissible), my brief would not suffer because, being extra cautious, I included absolutely everything and then some more of what was necessary for the purpose of that particular appeal.
Finally, I wanted to show the actual most important subject of that appeal that the corrupt Fifth Circuit carefully avoids mentioning – except as some ambiguous phrases in passing, purporting to cite the district court’s scumbags – while VERY carefully avoiding expressing any opinion on it or affirming it because it is in direct violation of the Supreme Court’s precedents and have been briefed by me more than sufficiently. That’s what the filthy Fifth Circuit claims – indirectly, in passing, and as if simply re-tells the district court’s falsities while avoiding expressing any opinion on it (Note that what you’d see below is a complete falsity and a deceptive utterance by the criminals-in-law):
Nearly my entire brief is dedicated to discussing the standard of “frivolity.” I discuss the section 1915 prisoner “frivolity” standard – as the scumbags corruptly mis-applied it to my civilian complaint – and show that under no circumstances my complaint could be dismissed under that theory because it’s bursting with countless well-pleaded facts that demonstrate violations of my civil rights.
However, the “alternative” (note, the middle district of Louisiana’s criminals-in-law shockingly and corruptly “not permitted” me to pay the filing fee and continued lying about it, telling me to try again and send another check – see Figures 1 and 2) is a completely different standard and the action could not possibly be dismissed without full briefing (defendants served, appear, make their filings and arguments and the plaintiff responds – which the scumbags of middle district of Louisiana artificially suppressed in my case and corruptly did not allow that to happen). Such action could only be dismissed sua sponte if it is clear that the district court has no subject-matter jurisdiction, but it actually rarely happens and briefing always allowed first (except when unscrupulous courts try to suppress one’s action and pervert the law and procedure for that purpose).
I explained all that in great detail in my complaint.
Oh, wait — they have no shame and are just the corrupt criminals-in-law.
The scumbag Degravelles picked the entirely inapplicable cases to narrowly extract inapplicable quotes and “reach” its corrupt, deceitful conclusions. The shameless public official cites the Fifth Circuit’s Dilworth and the Sixth Circuit’s Apple in which the litigants’ complaints were dismissed (not sua sponte, as Degravelles corruptly dismissed mine) because there were no federal questions presented. Note that he cherrypicked those entirely inapplicable cases. In other words, he shamefully chose the most nonsensical, the most inapplicable cases and corruptly “recited” their findings — which have no applicability whatsoever to my case.
The first litigant, Apple, believed that his first amendment rights were being violated because the top public officials did not respond to his personal letters and did not implement changes about government policy that he suggested, and the second one, Dilworth, claimed that he had a constitutional right to have an A in the class and that he was improperly given a B. Those issues do not present any contitutional questions.
I clearly showed that I brought the issues of constitutional dimension such as being denied equal protections of the laws, being discriminated based on my gender and national origin and not being connected to Louisiana law enforcement, corruption, and wealth, and then barbarically silenced, persecuted, and seriously harmed when I wanted to expose that outrageous corruption.
I cited the precedents that are directly on point to my situation and which I have weaved into my complaint and all my filings, such as Whren v. United States, 517 U.S. 806, 813 (1996), Estate of Macias v. Ihde, 219 F.3d 1018 (9th Cir. 2000), DeShaney v. Winnebago County Dep't of Soc. Servs., 489 U.S. 189, 197 n. 3, 109 S.Ct. 998, 103 L.Ed.2d 249 (1989), Elliot-Park v. Manglona, 592 F.3d 1003, 1007 (9th Cir. 2010), Bell v. Maryland, 378 U.S. 226, 309 (1964), and others.
In addition to the above-discussed inapplicable cases that Degravelles cherry-picked, he also shamelessly cited two more in his laughable 3-page “opinion.” Those two more cases were likely filed by the mentally ill and I cited them in my brief at length, to show just how corrupt and deceitful that public official who claimed that my legal action has anything to do with it, is.
In my briefing (see above, pages 33-34), I cited McLean v. Country of Mex. at length. It is so bizarre and outrageous that it has to be read in order to appreciate it. Note that corrupt Degravelles had the gall to claim that my action has something to do with it.
That corrupt public official had not stopped there, and together with the flunky- magistrate claimed that my action had to be corruptly thrown out because it was as “unsubstantial and fantastical” as Atakapa Indian de Creole Nation v. Louisiana, 943 F.3d 1004, 1007 (5th Cir. 2019) where the plaintiff made some truly bizarre requests, one of which was seeking to restrain the defendants from “monopolizing ... domestic, international and intergalactic commercial markets.”
So, what that void of any traces of integrity federal schmuck did was simply found the most inapplicable, grotesque, and bizarre cases there are, deceitfully extracted some higher courts’ statements about them, and shamelessly claimed that it somehow applies to my meritorious lawsuit that he simply does not like because, as a criminal-in-law, he is umbilically connected to all that corruption he has been an integral part of for decades.
Now — what is the actual standard of “frivolity,” as the Supreme Court defined it. No, it is not when a filthy public officials dislikes truthful facts that implicate his friends and drinking buddies and corruptly wants to suppress the meritorious suit. There are certain well-defined criteria, which I carefully and responsibly briefed. Note that those criteria apply to the prisoner suits and do not apply to me (remember, middle district of Louisiana had “not permitted” me to pay the filing fee so that it can pervert the procedure and somehow purport to “screen” my complaint under the inapplicable statute).
As has been explained above and also is explained in my brief, the Supreme Court has afforded much more “discretion” for the dismissal of the prisoner suits under section 1915, but, if the law is followed, no federal schmuck can just falsely and corruptly claim that something is “frivolous” when in fact it is not and simply throw out the meritorious suit that it “dislikes” under the guise of purported “frivolity”:
The judge has the right to hold that the prisoner’s suit is frivolous only when the allegations do not make sense logically and scientifically (Atakapa that was discussed above claimed that it needs protection from monopolization of “domestic, international and intergalactic commercial markets” – that is the example of the complaint that could have been dismissed as frivolous).
It has been stated above – with references to the law – that middle district of Louisiana could not screen my complaint under the prisoner statute because I am a civilian. However, even if it would corruptly apply that loose section 1915 standard to my complaint, it still lawfully – without perverting the facts and misapplying the law – could not dismiss it.
The scumbags throw more shit:
I never ever sought to amend my complaint for the second time and would not do that because it was not frivolous or deficient in any way, per the Supreme Court’s law. Note that the bastards do not mention at all in its illegitimate 2-page “opinion” what kind of purported “defects” were “still present” in my complaint.
As I also pointed out (page 42, Figure 24 ), because there was complete diversity of citizenship, per Hagans, middle district of Louisiana’s “judges” could not dismiss my action either under the guise of “frivolity” or even if it actually were “frivolous.” That is, Hagans says that even a complaint that does not present any federal questions still cannot be discarded sua sponte if diversity of citizenship is present.
My complaint makes clear that I was a citizen of Oregon whereas all other parties were citizens of Louisiana. I also stated it when was asked during the sham “hearing” that filthy Wilder-Doomes purported to hold. Middle district and the Fifth Circuit unlawfully removed the transcript from the record on appeal whereas it is by default part of the record and I specifically designated it as such and timely ordered it. That is another corrupt attempt to conceal and falsify evidence:
Note that malicious Fifth Circuit knew about it all along and carefully and criminally planned it together with middle district of Louisiana and the defendants-criminals that have been harming me. I requested that the transcript be properly added to the record on appeal over a year ago – well before my brief was submitted. The scumbags, while running an entirely corrupt simulation of the proceedings and conniving together, maliciously suppressed that request. All that falsification is a direct result of the conspiracy among the criminals — the Fifth Circuit, the middle district of Louisiana, and the filthy scumbags — defendants that I have been suing.
My brief is irrelevant to the sham-ruling and exists separately and on its own — the criminals-in-law did not even consider what I spent hundreds of hours researching and working on.
Their 100% deceitful, false fabrication exists separately from my legal action and is entirely corruptly predetermined.
I worked so hard on my brief. I have worked incredibly hard for the past four years, carefully collecting and preserving evidence that the criminals have been destroying, researching law and timely and sufficiently challenging every attempt of the filthy criminals of the “law enforcement” and various courts to thwart my access to courts, justice, and each attempt to hold them accountable.
This brief is more than sufficient and the Fifth Circuit’s corrupt 2-page sham-opinion (there are actually 4 pages but if you look at how many pages are occupied by the actual text, you’ll see that it’s just two pages) is just a deceitful, unlawful, and criminal attack on my constitutional rights.
Neither my appeal nor my brief is “frivolous,” and I brought and convincingly demonstrated serious and shocking violations of the law and procedure by the federal district court that has worked in criminal tandem with other corrupt public officials that have been denying my constitutional rights, persecuting me, and injuring me and my family.
This story demonstrates a pattern of persecution and discrimination by the dirty governments against anyone who dares to challenge its corruption. I know that there are other people who also have been abused by the corrupt courts and “law enforcement,” and might benefit from reading this. Please share this post to allow it to be discovered by those who might find it useful.
This long post is just a tiny portion of the story that attempted to focus on how the federal appellate court in a rabid and criminal act of deception, perversion of the law, the facts, and the truth had assisted the criminals in committing their atrocities and covering them up. There is much more to this story that reveals outrageous and impenetrable corruption, cruelty, malice, and criminal-mindedness of your “government.”