I contacted Diana West. Just like all other frauds, she ignored my request for “journalistic” coverage.
They are not your friends, they are your enemies.
Christopher Hitchens used to say that if there is one thing he would want people to understand after listening to his speeches and debates, that would be a realization that there is no connection between morality and religion.
Not only I completely agree with Hitchens on that notion, but I want to paraphrase it as follows: if there is one thing I could be successful in communicating to people and convincing them regarding it, that would be an understanding that “journalism” is heavily compromised and controlled.
I am not talking about “big” journalism. Many people came to realize that “big” journalism serves criminal governments and corporations. The most dangerous, however, are those bogus contrarians, planted to “lead resistance,” “fight attacks on humanity,” and distract the public.
Does anyone “owe” me a duty to publish or cover “my story?” No. But is it actually “my story” or an example of the dealings of the criminal cartel which people call “the government,” and which must be exposed?
What I have been documenting are CRIMES. The criminals have been falsifying public records, perjuring themselves, lying in the context in which it is not simply unacceptable but criminal, criminally blocking access to courts through stealing of my mail, falsifying and simulating “legal proceedings,” violating and perverting just about any statute, precedent, rule. They have been persecuting me and physically injuring for my integrity and because I protested their criminal activity.
Is it ethical to ignore, dismiss, and cover up such information? Is it ethical to aid the criminals in the crime cover-ups but instead push into the masses some meaningless hogwash and only “report” on the purposely engineered and carefully selected content?
By the way, the law specifically refers to “inaction” as a form of participation in reprehensible acts. See, e.g., Bell v. Maryland, 378 U.S. 226, 309 (1964). In other words, one participates in a crime through inaction and remaining silent about it.
Do those “journalists” cover someone else’s “stories” that expose dirty dealings of the criminal governments? I do not think so. If there is a rare such coverage than it is cherry-picked and government-approved.
With those “journalists,” it is usually just lather, rinse, repeat of the entertaining and distracting bullshit with the elements of “augmented reality.” Often in sequels, threequels, whatever. There is a steady supply of such an approved content for entertaining and dumbing down of the public, and a new “story” never fails to arrive.
It is nearly impossible to expose the criminals because the complicit phonies, the “gatekeepers of the government narrative,” have been placed everywhere.
They hypnotize the public and train it to rely on them for the “news delivery.” That usually happens with a massive support of the government media. A typical scenario: a fraud becomes a purported “free speech martyr;” gets “expelled” by the NY Times, twitter, whatever; a subtle advertisement and promotion by that same the NY Times follows; the “expelled” fraud “migrates” to substack and becomes a multimillionaire.
Through that masquerade, people are taught to trust the frauds — the purported “contrarians” — and only “take the news” from those lying charlatans. The frauds continue to be heavily boosted and popularized with the help of the government media and through the network of the bogus “journalists.” The public finds yet another “hero” to follow and becomes entirely unreceptive to the stories, presented by those whom it was not trained to trust or perceive as its “heroes.”
Despite the fact that I have actual and various evidence of the crimes that the criminals-in-law commit under the guise of authority of the law, after years of trying to locate at least one honest journalist who does not serve the state and/or other criminals, I have found only ONE SUCH A JOURNALIST.
Her name is Ramola D, and she has been brutally attacked for nine years with military grade tech for her honest reportage that exposes criminal dealings of the criminal governments.
Ramola told me that although the criminals have been hitting her remotely with the military weapons continuously and non-stop, including at the heart, after she promised to do a report about the crimes, committed against me and met with me for a preliminary discussion, the criminals have intensified their attacks.
In her own words:
“I have frequently been heart-hit when I publish or am getting ready to publish a particularly important article or podcast—I mean it has been nonstop heart hits at such times, over years now. I wear some kind of shielding at my heart all the time and sometimes have to increase this when being hit…I suspected your case coverage was also prompting some extra attention from the criminals. I just wanted to stress that they haven’t just “started to hit” now but recently turned to this special modality of intense attack it seems because once again I am working on a story which would expose their network of syndicated criminals playing Noble Lawkeepers.”
The malicious frauds who make millions for being the gatekeepers of the criminal narrative and who are “admired” by thousands and millions of the moronic followers and supporters should be evoking disgust and not “admiration.”
The liars deserve to be condemned for defrauding the public and aiding with cover-ups, crimes, and fraud.
This article is not about West but about all lying and malicious frauds who serve the “narrative” under the guise of “true journalism.”
Nevertheless, here is a copy of the email, which I sent to West (her email address is published on her website):
To receive new posts, consider subscribing.
I write articles and am always receiving requests such as yours listed above to Diana West. For the most part, if I respond saying I just don't have time, I will then receive all the excuses as to why I should read this particular item/items sent to me. If I tell them that I cannot possibly respond to all the requests I receive like this, I get the same response. For me, it's best to ignore them. Busy people cannot read everything people send you...it's impossible. But to call her names because she didn't reply is not a way to win friends and influence people. She will never respond to you now. I have read all of Diana's works, and they're brilliant and deeply researched. She also has a blog and writes some of the most in depth exposes I've ever read. I consider her an absolutely amazing journalist and author. Brilliant doesn't describe her. So, I think you'd probably be wise to delete the portions in which you claim she is another false person, and just understand that these kinds of requests come in all the time and we simply cannot do it.