For over four years, all my publications have been either instantly removed or made unsearchable and undiscoverable by the public by the scumbags whom my writings expose.
Yes, the corrupt, criminal, governments are lawless and will continue to cover up their crimes. That's not surprising. Sadly, it's not going to be changed easily, if at all.
It's more likely someone(s) following you and immediately reporting your posts at which time the AI is immediately removing or putting it in shadow until appealed or reviewed. And most, Twitter & Facebook being two prominent, don't ever change a person back to normal visibility.
I don't post on facebook or twitter. If you look at the printscreens above, you would see that my substack posts cannot be found and being made unsearchable and undiscoverable on the internet. My google reviews and other reviews also being made "invisible."
I know exactly who does that - and I mention it in this post: it is being done by corrupt Louisiana "law enforcement" and they started doing that when I stated that I will try to expose their crimes and outrageous corruption.
I can't post a screenshot here but your writings come up at top of list for me. My first search was simple "dissident's essay 5th circuit" and you were number one.
My next search was exact copy of your long one from your first screenshot and you came up first.
I use duck duck go add-on to a chrome on Android tablet.
Good to know that because I was trying to bring some attention to that outrageous barbaric censorship, the criminals apparently lifted the unlawful "restrictions" that they placed. It happened to me once before but only for a brief moment. If for the next 30 days my publication will be appearing in the search results - then and only then I will say that my publication is finally not being hidden from the public view.
Just for the record - when I wrote this post, my publication was not appearing anywhere in the internet, as shown above. After I tried to sound the alarm and bring some attention to that absolute censorship, it started appearing in duckduckgo. The statistics show that duckduckgo is used by around 2% of the US population and by 0.6% of people worldwide. In google in all its forms (Chrome, as a search engine in Mozilla, etc.) which is used by 80% or more of Americans, it remains hidden and cannot be discovered.
What is so weird about someone being eliminated from the internet?
I wrote about it in the comments below - when I made this post, I was not appearing anywhere, including duckduckgo. After I sounded the alarm and attracted some - however minimal - attention to it on substack, it appears that the criminals removed the restrictions from duckduckgo. Possibly to contradict me and try to make me appear untrustworthy, etc.
The statistics I found say that only less or around 2% of Americans use duckduckgo and roughly 0.6% of the worldwide population uses it.
I know from the previous experience that adding backlinks will not change anything. It is being done on purpose and controlled externally.
Hi I did not mean links TO other sites from your post, I meant add links to your posts from other sites. That can help your site get indexed by Google, though there's no guarantee. This type of content and wouldn't fit Google's "quality" considerations (because they don't agree with the content).
It's common to have problems getting indexed and yes it is a form of censorship.
You can also try submitting your site to other search engines.
You can try adding a lot of "easy to get" links from Web 2.0s, social media sites, profiles, etc., in the hopes that it will "wake up" the crawlers and get the site indexed.
Also, try linking from one post to another.
Google keeps many sites and pages unindexed. It's not humans reading it, it's algorithms looking for signals. Linking OUT to high-quality sites won't hurt, but it won't make you get indexed. I think I sent you a link about Webmaster Tools. Doing that is probably your best bet.
Regarding your other comment, Google has indexed those other sites, therefore the name of your Substack is showing up when you search, because those sites are indexed. But it's your own Substack that Google has not indexed. Since it's not indexed, it doesn't show up even if you type a direct link, because the site is not in the list of things that Google is combing through.
Might help to take an SEO course or read blogs about SEO.
Here's more info--you will need to make this into a live link) nichepursuits dot com/how-to-get-more-pages-indexed-by-google/
Thanks for your suggestions. I understand that you recommend a technical approach and believe that being more tech savvy would have solved the problem.
However, it would not. I understand that my publications have not been indexed but it is so by design.
As for whether they agree with the content – there is lots of content that we would think would not fit their “quality” criteria – for example, countless journals that purport to harshly criticize the “covid” narratives, most of which are written by the controlled opposition. Those phony “martyrs” are being “censored” however the amount of their content, steadily promoted by google is nauseating.
And yes, I understand that the other substacks that were found when I searched for myself have been indexed. My point was that one of the authors states that she has been banned everywhere, on all social media, and cannot even view its content. And yet, google does not silence her and does not hide her publications.
I used to have a small business website that I built myself and which was “indexed” immediately after it went live. People were finding me and contacting me. But it was at the time when I was not trying to expose corruption and therefore no one was silencing me.
I saw substacks that were just created and have one post and no activity whatsoever but they are being shown by google.
I also understand that it is “not humans reading it,” there is some sort of algorithm in place not to display my content.
For example, when I leave a google review and immediately sign out, the review is not visible to the public. If I sign back in, it shows that it is purportedly there. Changing computers, routers, network providers, email addresses, and phone numbers does not help. At the time when I was not being censored and silenced, I was able to leave reviews and they were visible to everyone.
Unfortunately, “taking an SEO course” would not help.
When a name of any criminal "public official" is searched for, in any combination and with inclusion of the words that are unique to my publications, it never comes up in the search results.
People do not find my articles even when they specifically search for the topics / keywords I write about.
So, I would not say that anything was "fixed," as I continue being shadowbanned and excluded, which does not surprise me a bit.
I was just trying the phrase you gave as an example, with “dissident”. And without even “Substack.” Tried again. No results from Google now but you’re still on the first page of results for DuckDuckGo. This is in response to your claim that your page wouldn’t show up even if you include the author’s name, unlike with Kirsch and Malone.
I substantiated my "claim" with the screen shots, and it also has been stated that shortly after I published the article, some posts of my journal started showing up in search results in duckduckgo.
It appears that the criminals that read this substack very closely, removed that "restriction."
Duckduckgo is used by 0.6% to 2.6% of the population, according to the "statistics."
Even when some of my articles show up in the search, it is always when searched in a certain way, with the certain keywords inclusion. For example, if one types "sandra ikuta corrupt" or the name of any other criminal I wrote about, it would never show up in any results, even in duckduckgo.
Malone's name, when searched on google, has 30 million hits. Mine - ZERO.
No, my articles or everything I do are not being advertised "unlike Kirsch and Malone" but being suppressed and buried in various ways. You comment seem to imply otherwise.
Yes, the corrupt, criminal, governments are lawless and will continue to cover up their crimes. That's not surprising. Sadly, it's not going to be changed easily, if at all.
It's more likely someone(s) following you and immediately reporting your posts at which time the AI is immediately removing or putting it in shadow until appealed or reviewed. And most, Twitter & Facebook being two prominent, don't ever change a person back to normal visibility.
I don't post on facebook or twitter. If you look at the printscreens above, you would see that my substack posts cannot be found and being made unsearchable and undiscoverable on the internet. My google reviews and other reviews also being made "invisible."
I know exactly who does that - and I mention it in this post: it is being done by corrupt Louisiana "law enforcement" and they started doing that when I stated that I will try to expose their crimes and outrageous corruption.
I can't post a screenshot here but your writings come up at top of list for me. My first search was simple "dissident's essay 5th circuit" and you were number one.
My next search was exact copy of your long one from your first screenshot and you came up first.
I use duck duck go add-on to a chrome on Android tablet.
Good to know that because I was trying to bring some attention to that outrageous barbaric censorship, the criminals apparently lifted the unlawful "restrictions" that they placed. It happened to me once before but only for a brief moment. If for the next 30 days my publication will be appearing in the search results - then and only then I will say that my publication is finally not being hidden from the public view.
Just for the record - when I wrote this post, my publication was not appearing anywhere in the internet, as shown above. After I tried to sound the alarm and bring some attention to that absolute censorship, it started appearing in duckduckgo. The statistics show that duckduckgo is used by around 2% of the US population and by 0.6% of people worldwide. In google in all its forms (Chrome, as a search engine in Mozilla, etc.) which is used by 80% or more of Americans, it remains hidden and cannot be discovered.
Weird. I do find you on DuckDuckGo. Try adding more backlinks to your posts from outside sites (not Substack) and see what happens.
What is so weird about someone being eliminated from the internet?
I wrote about it in the comments below - when I made this post, I was not appearing anywhere, including duckduckgo. After I sounded the alarm and attracted some - however minimal - attention to it on substack, it appears that the criminals removed the restrictions from duckduckgo. Possibly to contradict me and try to make me appear untrustworthy, etc.
The statistics I found say that only less or around 2% of Americans use duckduckgo and roughly 0.6% of the worldwide population uses it.
I know from the previous experience that adding backlinks will not change anything. It is being done on purpose and controlled externally.
Not saying it's NOT done on purpose, but it can be hard to get new blogs (not just Substacks) to index
https://rsilt.substack.com/p/how-i-got-my-substack-to-be-google?s=r
In my case, that is not the reason. Even when I type a direct, full, and unique link, it still remains hidden.
Funny, google finds it in other substacks where I posted partial names of my publication in the comments.
I have documented it here:
https://1dissident.substack.com/p/barbaric-censorship-still?s=w
It contains 91 embedded links to the external websites and still does not appear in search results.
Hi I did not mean links TO other sites from your post, I meant add links to your posts from other sites. That can help your site get indexed by Google, though there's no guarantee. This type of content and wouldn't fit Google's "quality" considerations (because they don't agree with the content).
It's common to have problems getting indexed and yes it is a form of censorship.
You can also try submitting your site to other search engines.
You can try adding a lot of "easy to get" links from Web 2.0s, social media sites, profiles, etc., in the hopes that it will "wake up" the crawlers and get the site indexed.
Also, try linking from one post to another.
Google keeps many sites and pages unindexed. It's not humans reading it, it's algorithms looking for signals. Linking OUT to high-quality sites won't hurt, but it won't make you get indexed. I think I sent you a link about Webmaster Tools. Doing that is probably your best bet.
Regarding your other comment, Google has indexed those other sites, therefore the name of your Substack is showing up when you search, because those sites are indexed. But it's your own Substack that Google has not indexed. Since it's not indexed, it doesn't show up even if you type a direct link, because the site is not in the list of things that Google is combing through.
Might help to take an SEO course or read blogs about SEO.
Here's more info--you will need to make this into a live link) nichepursuits dot com/how-to-get-more-pages-indexed-by-google/
Thanks for your suggestions. I understand that you recommend a technical approach and believe that being more tech savvy would have solved the problem.
However, it would not. I understand that my publications have not been indexed but it is so by design.
As for whether they agree with the content – there is lots of content that we would think would not fit their “quality” criteria – for example, countless journals that purport to harshly criticize the “covid” narratives, most of which are written by the controlled opposition. Those phony “martyrs” are being “censored” however the amount of their content, steadily promoted by google is nauseating.
And yes, I understand that the other substacks that were found when I searched for myself have been indexed. My point was that one of the authors states that she has been banned everywhere, on all social media, and cannot even view its content. And yet, google does not silence her and does not hide her publications.
I used to have a small business website that I built myself and which was “indexed” immediately after it went live. People were finding me and contacting me. But it was at the time when I was not trying to expose corruption and therefore no one was silencing me.
I saw substacks that were just created and have one post and no activity whatsoever but they are being shown by google.
I also understand that it is “not humans reading it,” there is some sort of algorithm in place not to display my content.
For example, when I leave a google review and immediately sign out, the review is not visible to the public. If I sign back in, it shows that it is purportedly there. Changing computers, routers, network providers, email addresses, and phone numbers does not help. At the time when I was not being censored and silenced, I was able to leave reviews and they were visible to everyone.
Unfortunately, “taking an SEO course” would not help.
Tried Google and DuckDuckGo for “Fifth Circuit Corruption dissident” and got the appropriate Substack article. Looks like the problem has been fixed.
When a name of any criminal "public official" is searched for, in any combination and with inclusion of the words that are unique to my publications, it never comes up in the search results.
People do not find my articles even when they specifically search for the topics / keywords I write about.
So, I would not say that anything was "fixed," as I continue being shadowbanned and excluded, which does not surprise me a bit.
I was just trying the phrase you gave as an example, with “dissident”. And without even “Substack.” Tried again. No results from Google now but you’re still on the first page of results for DuckDuckGo. This is in response to your claim that your page wouldn’t show up even if you include the author’s name, unlike with Kirsch and Malone.
I substantiated my "claim" with the screen shots, and it also has been stated that shortly after I published the article, some posts of my journal started showing up in search results in duckduckgo.
It appears that the criminals that read this substack very closely, removed that "restriction."
Duckduckgo is used by 0.6% to 2.6% of the population, according to the "statistics."
Even when some of my articles show up in the search, it is always when searched in a certain way, with the certain keywords inclusion. For example, if one types "sandra ikuta corrupt" or the name of any other criminal I wrote about, it would never show up in any results, even in duckduckgo.
Malone's name, when searched on google, has 30 million hits. Mine - ZERO.
No, my articles or everything I do are not being advertised "unlike Kirsch and Malone" but being suppressed and buried in various ways. You comment seem to imply otherwise.