Discover more from Dissident’s Essay
Yes, people “deserve” their “government.”
Eureka! It’s a perfect match.
I was overthinking and “philosophizing” in vain whereas the answer was obvious: people’s “government” is just what they want and “matches” perfectly the majority of people.
When I think about the universal extent of deception, hypocrisy, and pretense, I realize that it’s not just about the criminal “government” and the wholly corrupt and fraudulent “media.”
There is an unspoken universal agreement among people, and to be a “valuable” member of society, one has to be a “normal” person: pretend, pander, lie, unsee, fawn, falsify, ignore the truth, dismiss the facts, express and acknowledge only “popular” and “approved” opinions, and be ready do anything to get ahead in life. In other words, to be a scumbag. The ones who do not fit the description of the “normal,” perceived as “weird” who deserve to be scorned.
When I show that the “government” violates the statutory law and uses crime, fraud, and deception in order to block my access to the “courts,” a few people seem to care.
Countless bogus “activists” discuss the “legal system” as if it were legit, and countless people – the same ones that seem to be (secretly) reading my substack – support the frauds and engage in discussions about the “working legal system.”
I suppose that is courtesy to the universal scumbaggery of the “normal” people – they implicitly agree to ignore the facts that “everybody ignores” and there is an unspoken understanding regarding this among “normal” people.
Why not just talk about the approved topics, stories, or engage pointlessly and endlessly in some empty demagoguery and general, abstract theorizing about corruption or injustice?
In the world of the frauds, “not stepping on anybody’s toes” is considered a virtue and called “heroism.” It’s appalling how the word “hero” is being wasted!
I am asking people and the “activists” to simply tell their “judges” that they must not disregard the statutory and other law, which they must “apply” uniformly, but everybody ignores me. Or do people think that the criminals would “go after” them for acknowledging the truth and the obvious facts?
The absurdity. But what difference does that make (even if there could be any repercussions) for all those “heroes” who – as the public being lied to ceaselessly – “risk” their lives or livelihoods for “speaking” about “censored” topics?
I am correcting my line of thought regarding people being oppressed by the criminal governments. They – the majority – are not oppressed; they comply and maintain that implicit agreement to ignore certain facts, crimes, and people. It’s convenient and they do not mind that someone like me is treated unlawfully by “the law.”
The law should be applied uniformly – that is the most basic principle of that “law” – but when the criminals want to pretend, pervert, and lie – people do not mind at all to go along. After all, it’s not them who are being treated unlawfully, and it is safer not say anything, just like no one does. It is safer to continue engaging in the empty lather, rinse, and repeat discussions about abstract corruption and other approved topics.
The scumbaggy “government” – for the scumbags.
And the few unruly, unconventional, and inconvenient can just go jump in the lake.