Silverman, Ikuta, and Miller – the worthless lying nits of the Ninth Circuit criminally “dismiss” my appeal in a striking and shocking violation of the law.
Silverman, Ikuta, and Miller – the worthless lying nits of the Ninth Circuit criminally “dismiss” my appeal in a striking and shocking violation of the law.
Of course, the entire criminal cartel is responsible, not just those dumb nits. Nevertheless, the scumbags rubberstamped their names on the strikingly criminal “dismissal.”
Silverman, Ikuta, and Miller – the worthless lying nits of the Ninth Circuit criminally “dismiss” my appeal in a striking and shocking violation of the law.
Truly, what these criminals do is akin to abducting an innocent person, throwing her/him to prison, and simply holding there for several years. Would anyone object to that or voice a concern about a human being (or an animal) being treated that way?
The “press” says that to advocate for Steven Donziger and demand justice and impartial application of the law in his case, some 68 “Nobel laureates” contacted the president of the US. “Over 475 lawyers, legal organizations and human rights defenders” supported Donziger’s cause.
In my case, the violation of the law and criminal dealings are at least not less shocking than in Donziger’s. The only difference is — absolutely everyone, including the purported “lawyers, legal organizations, human rights defenders,” ‘journalists,’ ‘reporters,’ ‘bloggers,’ you name it, ignore me.
The worthless nits and criminals are very well aware of that – that’s per the criminal design and they constantly closely monitor everything I do. They interfere, steal, destroy, attack, poison, intercept, divert, etc.
Empowered by the knowledge that their crimes will be kept in secret and the wikipedia will not write about their crimes, the deranged shameless psychopaths have no limit of how far they would go.
I wrote in several posts that the criminals have been blocking my access to “courts” through crime and deceit for years. In this post, I provided a short summary of the well-coordinated criminal dealings by the criminals-in-law in order to deprive me of my rights.
And here,
I posted a letter that I sent to Murguia – a chief judge and administrator of the appellate court for the Ninth Circuit.
I cited the applicable laws and rules that UNEQUIVOCALLY and INDISPUTABLY show that the filthy Ninth Circuit, through crime and deceit, had been suppressing my appeal and my emergency motion for summary reversal. See the original motion, filed with the Ninth Circuit, attached below.
If you have time, please read it as it demonstrates that ALL statutory provisions and controlling precedents support my position. I am 100% correct regarding the applicable law – and I invite anyone to challenge me and try to “prove” otherwise in the comments below.
That only emphasizes the extent of the criminal dealings and deception of those foul worthless nits, pictured at the beginning of the post. Not only those degenerates are responsible for the crimes but the entire Ninth Circuit is. I wrote to Murguia right after the foul scumbags started abusing the procedure and suppressing my appeal. So Murguia’s image also should be displayed here.
In short, for those who have no time or interest at looking at those “legal” filings, I will state that my appeal is strikingly meritorious and it is obvious on its face. However, because the criminal “dismissal” by filthy Aiken involved the distinct violation of the Federal Rules, my appeal was also qualified for summary reversal, according to the Ninth Circuit rules (see the motion, attached below; see letter to Murguia – all applicable laws and rules are cited there).
The foul scumbags preach that under no circumstances the Federal Rules may be disregarded. That is, if they were disregarded, the “judgment” would necessarily be reversed. See Yamamoto v. Omiya, 564 F.2d 1319, 1327 (9th Cir. 1977).
For example, the Federal Rule 4(d)(2)(A) says:
If a defendant located within the United States fails, without good cause, to sign and return a waiver requested by a plaintiff located within the United States, the court MUST impose on the defendant the expenses later incurred in making service. (emphasis added).
Filthy Aiken, however, entirely ignored my motions for costs although the imposition of costs is mandatory, per the Federal Rules.
As I said before, the foul scumbags stole ALL my funds (over $100,000.00), stole the money that I had to pay again and again as filing fees for the actions that they have been criminally and unlawfully throwing out, and stole the funds that are MANDATORY costs per the controlling law – and that is not open to discussion and the costs must have been awarded.
I also filed motions for Rule 11 sanctions for the lies and perversion of the law by the foul defendants. The scumbags’ own “law” says:
“The district court is not at liberty to exempt [anyone] automatically from the rule's [11] requirements.” Warren v. Guelker, 29 F.3d 1386, 1390 (9th Cir. 1994). It “cannot decline to impose any sanction, where a violation has arguably occurred” Id. In Warren, the Ninth Circuit specifically “reverse[d] and remand[ed] for a determination of whether [a party] violated Rule 11.”
It is also not open to discussion – when the filthy “district court” fails to “rule” on the Rule 11 motions, the filthy appellate nits automatically reverse and remand for further proceedings, and that’s why their summary reversal procedures have been established.
Of course, if you read my motion below and if you’ve read my posts in this blog, you’d know that the criminals have been also preventing me from accessing “medical” services for over a year, and that unquestionably falls within the concept of the “rights delayed (being) rights denied,” appropriate for summary disposition.
There are a couple dozen of laws, rules, precedents that make my appeal strikingly powerful, meritorious, and substantiated by the controlling law and facts. That means that the nits could under no circumstances lawfully “dismiss” it.
However, the violation of the statutory law and the Federal Rules eliminates any need for any further discussion.
The foul criminal nits, in a 10-word or so fabrication, by simply falsely, criminally, and fraudulently claiming that my appeal is “frivolous,” “dismissed” it as the way of continuing criminal barricading of access to “courts.”
I wish people would understand the extent of the criminal conduct of the nits.
The criminals deliberately violate the statutory law in order to assist in the crimes and crime cover-ups.
That - a complete disregard for the statutory provisions - is unheard of and hard to believe.
And yet, absolutely every bogus “activist” ignores me and the information I share while continue “reporting” the hogwash and dupe the public.
But the “public” does not mind – it also ignores me.
The criminal nits know that they continue “safely” committing their crimes in secret. Because “no one knows” or acknowledges the crimes, they shamefully lie, deceive, defraud, and deprive of all legal rights:
How do I hold the foul nits accountable and how do I gain access to “courts” — “a constitutional right of momentous importance,” McCray v. State of Maryland, 456 F.2d 1, 6 (4th Cir. 1972)?
"Law for thou, but not for me..."
Check the "search" results for the sentence...