Of course, the entire criminal cartel is responsible, not just those dumb nits. Nevertheless, the scumbags rubberstamped their names on the strikingly criminal “dismissal.”
I did and the first result was an article in "the American conservative" about a "judge" having / making a choice and some "unjust" laws.
In my case, the law is "just" and it wholly supports my position.
Also, in my case those "judges" do not have any "choice" since it is either the statutory law or some powerful precedents and principles of jurisprudence.
That's why they simply shamefully lie.
That's why the focal point of my advocacy for myself is making people to understand what is actually going on.
"Law for thou, but not for me..."
Check the "search" results for the sentence...
I did and the first result was an article in "the American conservative" about a "judge" having / making a choice and some "unjust" laws.
In my case, the law is "just" and it wholly supports my position.
Also, in my case those "judges" do not have any "choice" since it is either the statutory law or some powerful precedents and principles of jurisprudence.
That's why they simply shamefully lie.
That's why the focal point of my advocacy for myself is making people to understand what is actually going on.