Of course not: Hitler was satan incarnated, who started a world war in order to exterminate anyone he didn't like. Keep believing, because clearly you can't use reasoning.
There are a handful here, on Substack, but I was already trolled and attacked before I reached one thousand subscribers. My best guess is that I can still operate before 10k, but I'm not sure what the limit is, after which I will be intimidated or destroyed. I feel comfortable about the latter, because keeping silent only speeds up the globalist plan.
I followed Margaret Anne for a while, and some of her articles rang a bell, especially the one with the holocaust deniers. I am still following Tessa Lena but read her posts sparingly. Never heard of the others. Even some of the doctors are question marks. Do they really mean what they say? How can one be sure? Those that still push for jabs other than the covid, I don't follow anymore. I only read Malone for the memes. Well, I read mostly memes nowadays LOL
I follow Margaret Anne but skip most of her articles. Even if she is controlled opposition some of her writings so make sense and seem to hit the mark. I followed James Roguski for awhile but I found his writing and letter writing campaigns tedious and silly at best and deleted him. It is tough to decide who to listen too. One needs to get info from some source so I read dozens of Substacks and weed them out. I take them all with a grain of salt and try and piece the puzzle together through my own research and extensive reading of books - there too one has to think deeply about the concepts presented. The more one wakes up to the long running scam the more skeptical one is of anything presented as fact or even alternative fact. My one long-term go too is James Corbett who I've trusted for years. I watch, listen, and dig into his links for verification - I prey someone here doesn't burst that bubble as well.
another name I don't know. My most read are Egyppius and the bad cat, together with Jeff Childers Coffee and Covid and the Covidsteria, always a pleasure. I also follow Mickey Z, same generation but he is a NYC man so quite a difference! Mark Oshinskie. I stopped following most of the doctors except Malone for the memes.
"My most read are Egyppius and the bad cat" - these are so obviously horrible, in every sense, they do not even need to be exposed. Definitely frauds, big time.
Who is empowering you? That is my criteria to judgment. I don’t care if they are trying to make a buck (outrageous buck making is unconscionable) but, if they are not offering empowering solutions they are to be viewed with a certain amount of skepticism but not ever outright ignored. I suspect that some of them are not aware that they are being manipulated. Do not discount their intelligence and the fact that they, like ALL of us, are navigating a minefield in 5th generation warfare!
Amen. We need to read all we can and filter out the BS with our own intelligence. Those of us who read various so-called "independent" journalists do so from a deep distrust of the main steam media. The same skeptical nature that lead us here must remain intact. I think those in this space, the readers, possess the ability to think and reason and all of us do our own deeper dives into areas of concern. Sharing our concerns about various authors is a good thing but each one of us needs to draw our own conclusions based on our own knowledge and experiences. Learning and being awake to the techniques of 5th generation warfare is the best way to start then tend your own thought garden and weed out the invasive plants.
I listen to James too. It’s an innate discernment you have to use…sometimes it’s not just the info presented but the person presenting it. Better to have people discernment.
What made me suspicious of Mihalcea is the therapy she invented and promotes, the so-called "Science of Light". These are belts with blue LEDs that are supposed to have a healing effect on the body tissue.
Now, blue light is the worst of them all. It's the reason why computer and mobile phone screens are so damaging, because they emit blue light. Blue light damages the cells and leads to accelerated aging. To protect yourself, you can either download extra screensavers or wear yellow glasses.
At first I thought that maybe there are different kinds of blue light, and she is promoting the healty version, but no, blue is blue.
So why does she promote it then? Does she want to damage people ? Well ....
There is a lot of deception in the alternative healing scene, too. It is rumoured the entire New Age scene has been invented by the CIA. There are for sure some who do a lot of damage under the guise of "healing". And they have become pretty good at disguising themselves.
Sorry, but I lost you at calling Zero Hedge and Off Guardian frauds.
Maybe you are right. But maybe not. Whom do we trust? You don't really establish your epistemology. Very disappointing. How do we know YOU, yourself, aren't part of the disinfo programme? Not saying you are, and your questions are very real, and much understood, but still the question remains.
We are now in the same place the French resistance was in WWII - who is a traitor, who is a double agent... or who might even be a triple agent? THAT is the question. It has NOT been answered here. I do grant that this is an important question, and appreciate it being posed. .
The purported alternative media which does not publish any single truly “alternative” article (the one that goes against criminals in gov and other scumbags that serve those criminals) and does not publish even the comments, critical of controlled opposition – (are) not frauds?
I do not “really establish (my) epistemology?” “Epistemology, or the theory of knowledge, is the branch of philosophy concerned with knowledge. Epistemology is considered a major subfield of philosophy, along with other major subfields such as ethics, logic, and metaphysics.” Nearly everything in this world is purportedly based on the theory of knowledge and logic, and of course, we’re told, is “ethical” and “based on science.” In reality, there are endless lies, propaganda, perverted facts, made up “facts,” crime, fraud, cheap pretense, empty demagoguery, and so on.
I do not aspire to prove anything to anyone. I cannot find more than a few honest and conscientious people who would at least acknowledge that the nasty scumbags they call their “judges” have been openly falsifying documents, aiding in my persecution and silencing, poisoning me and preventing from accessing “medical” services thereafter, etc. Of course, there are TENS OF THOUSANDS of other filthy scumbags that also have been participating in the crimes, but the foul scumbags in filthy black robes have been committing the crimes against me “in the name of the ‘law’” when I was following the law to the tee and trying to use it as that ‘law’ directs.
I amassed more evidence than likely anyone else in a somewhat similar position, and have been posting some of it here, including audio recordings, “police” reports, and so on. I brilliantly used logic, observation, and analysis to document and preserve all evidence, concerning the crimes, committed against me and my family and point out the lies by the official criminals. I also bravely have been trying to communicate it to the public, while being silenced and oppressed by the nasty scumbags whom that evidence incriminates.
That was before I realized that there is no way to expose the criminals. To whom will I be exposing them if 99.9% of the scumbaggy public would gladly do the same (participate in document falsification, crime cover-ups, harming me, etc.) if given the chance? In fact, “the public” already does it by pretending to not understand what is going on, “unsee” the evidence, logic, and acuteness of the issues I raise. Empty demagoguery by the fraudulent controlled opposition is much safer and more soothing to the phonies that like to be manipulated.
You’re very “disappointed?”. “How do (you) know (that I am not) “part of the disinfo programme?” You can read the articles in which I post evidence (no one else does, and no one else posts any such documents, even when some nasty fraud breaks a “big” story to the moronic public) and urge people to acknowledge that the crimes are being committed under the guise of the “law.” Or do not read anything. At this point, it makes no difference to me. See above.
To be sure, I am categorically NOT accusing you of being disinfo. In fact, the opposite. But I believe you misunderstood. The issue is a *general*, philosophical one. But you seem to be obscurantist in that "there are endless lies, propaganda," etc. This is true. But it is not that we cannot know anything. That, mon ami, is the question of the hour, and we all need an answer to. But, I think you are taking my comment, rather than constructive, as accusatory, when it is anything but. So, to that end, I thank you for your work here, which had a lot of good, but I'm not interested in some internet "pissing match" where people misinterpret the innocuous intent of another poster, and on ad infinitim.
Best wishes in your work. You do truly appear to be one of the good guys, which is obvious from your intent; your work is important and valuable in a world full of lies; however, I don't wish to engage with back and forths like this; it also wastes your time as well.
Thank you for noticing! I haven’t given any of them any more of my time after the initial reads of their emotionally driven yakings. The materialistic marketing scumbags are loving their 15 seconds of fame 🤑🤮. More useful going outside to work, just cleaned up three downed trees, fire wood for next year 😻
"The materialistic marketing scumbags are loving their 15 seconds of fame. More useful going outside to work" - Why would they work? They are not just getting strong, sickening presence on the internet but millions of admirers and become multimillionaires. https://1dissident.substack.com/p/the-censorship-wars-engineered-by
It's being "tolerated" to give the stage to a bunch of frauds (and make them filthy rich in the process!), and manufacture the false impression of "free speech," but most of my articles - the important ones that incriminate the scumbags - do not appear in search results (even when searched word-for-word). They are not being indexed, and that's only what is obvious. There are certainly processes in place to suppress them and make them unsearchable/unviewable by the general public. In other words, people who could be interested in reading my blog will never "randomly" find it. Substack claims that it indexes everything after a certain number of subscribers was reached but in reality only some of my general, unimportant articles do sometimes appear in search results.
What do you think about Paul Alexander? He is really going after Malone right now. It is hard to see how they are both controlled opposition. Unless the CIA is just getting bored and wants to shake things up a bit...
Of course not: Hitler was satan incarnated, who started a world war in order to exterminate anyone he didn't like. Keep believing, because clearly you can't use reasoning.
Please, share more of your findings and observations!
Alone we arrived, alone we shall go.
I place my hope in the inevitable.
There is NO alt.media period
https://artofliberty.org/controlled-opposition-watch/
There are a handful here, on Substack, but I was already trolled and attacked before I reached one thousand subscribers. My best guess is that I can still operate before 10k, but I'm not sure what the limit is, after which I will be intimidated or destroyed. I feel comfortable about the latter, because keeping silent only speeds up the globalist plan.
The "government" is controlled by the same people who control controlled opposition. :)
Thanks for cross posting Ray, very helpful for the ‘make up your own mind’ people.
I am cross-posting this. It's excellent!
The cross-posting option is not available here, so I'll send it to my subscribers by e-mail.
I followed Margaret Anne for a while, and some of her articles rang a bell, especially the one with the holocaust deniers. I am still following Tessa Lena but read her posts sparingly. Never heard of the others. Even some of the doctors are question marks. Do they really mean what they say? How can one be sure? Those that still push for jabs other than the covid, I don't follow anymore. I only read Malone for the memes. Well, I read mostly memes nowadays LOL
I follow Margaret Anne but skip most of her articles. Even if she is controlled opposition some of her writings so make sense and seem to hit the mark. I followed James Roguski for awhile but I found his writing and letter writing campaigns tedious and silly at best and deleted him. It is tough to decide who to listen too. One needs to get info from some source so I read dozens of Substacks and weed them out. I take them all with a grain of salt and try and piece the puzzle together through my own research and extensive reading of books - there too one has to think deeply about the concepts presented. The more one wakes up to the long running scam the more skeptical one is of anything presented as fact or even alternative fact. My one long-term go too is James Corbett who I've trusted for years. I watch, listen, and dig into his links for verification - I prey someone here doesn't burst that bubble as well.
another name I don't know. My most read are Egyppius and the bad cat, together with Jeff Childers Coffee and Covid and the Covidsteria, always a pleasure. I also follow Mickey Z, same generation but he is a NYC man so quite a difference! Mark Oshinskie. I stopped following most of the doctors except Malone for the memes.
"My most read are Egyppius and the bad cat" - these are so obviously horrible, in every sense, they do not even need to be exposed. Definitely frauds, big time.
Who is empowering you? That is my criteria to judgment. I don’t care if they are trying to make a buck (outrageous buck making is unconscionable) but, if they are not offering empowering solutions they are to be viewed with a certain amount of skepticism but not ever outright ignored. I suspect that some of them are not aware that they are being manipulated. Do not discount their intelligence and the fact that they, like ALL of us, are navigating a minefield in 5th generation warfare!
Amen. We need to read all we can and filter out the BS with our own intelligence. Those of us who read various so-called "independent" journalists do so from a deep distrust of the main steam media. The same skeptical nature that lead us here must remain intact. I think those in this space, the readers, possess the ability to think and reason and all of us do our own deeper dives into areas of concern. Sharing our concerns about various authors is a good thing but each one of us needs to draw our own conclusions based on our own knowledge and experiences. Learning and being awake to the techniques of 5th generation warfare is the best way to start then tend your own thought garden and weed out the invasive plants.
I listen to James too. It’s an innate discernment you have to use…sometimes it’s not just the info presented but the person presenting it. Better to have people discernment.
What made me suspicious of Mihalcea is the therapy she invented and promotes, the so-called "Science of Light". These are belts with blue LEDs that are supposed to have a healing effect on the body tissue.
Now, blue light is the worst of them all. It's the reason why computer and mobile phone screens are so damaging, because they emit blue light. Blue light damages the cells and leads to accelerated aging. To protect yourself, you can either download extra screensavers or wear yellow glasses.
At first I thought that maybe there are different kinds of blue light, and she is promoting the healty version, but no, blue is blue.
So why does she promote it then? Does she want to damage people ? Well ....
There is a lot of deception in the alternative healing scene, too. It is rumoured the entire New Age scene has been invented by the CIA. There are for sure some who do a lot of damage under the guise of "healing". And they have become pretty good at disguising themselves.
Mercola , R Kennedy jr are frauds?
Most definitely...
Anyone who seems to get massive attacked and fined, but still continues is CO.
How many small people tend to get 'siucided'? Get it now?
I’m having a cognitive dissonance on this. Especially w R Kennedy…..
Mercola is a little too Wuhans heavy for me.
Robert, too 5G heavy for me, and of course, as always, I could be wrong. 🙂
I like Mercola.
You mean wuhan lab? Heavy? Is that what you mean?
I’m emf sensitive, so 5 G scares the hell out of me
Yes the whole CV19 thing.
Do certain types of lighbulbs affect you differently than others?
I’m not a fan of LED.
They have a flicker to them.
But I do love they don’t get hot.
Sorry, but I lost you at calling Zero Hedge and Off Guardian frauds.
Maybe you are right. But maybe not. Whom do we trust? You don't really establish your epistemology. Very disappointing. How do we know YOU, yourself, aren't part of the disinfo programme? Not saying you are, and your questions are very real, and much understood, but still the question remains.
We are now in the same place the French resistance was in WWII - who is a traitor, who is a double agent... or who might even be a triple agent? THAT is the question. It has NOT been answered here. I do grant that this is an important question, and appreciate it being posed. .
The purported alternative media which does not publish any single truly “alternative” article (the one that goes against criminals in gov and other scumbags that serve those criminals) and does not publish even the comments, critical of controlled opposition – (are) not frauds?
I do not “really establish (my) epistemology?” “Epistemology, or the theory of knowledge, is the branch of philosophy concerned with knowledge. Epistemology is considered a major subfield of philosophy, along with other major subfields such as ethics, logic, and metaphysics.” Nearly everything in this world is purportedly based on the theory of knowledge and logic, and of course, we’re told, is “ethical” and “based on science.” In reality, there are endless lies, propaganda, perverted facts, made up “facts,” crime, fraud, cheap pretense, empty demagoguery, and so on.
I do not aspire to prove anything to anyone. I cannot find more than a few honest and conscientious people who would at least acknowledge that the nasty scumbags they call their “judges” have been openly falsifying documents, aiding in my persecution and silencing, poisoning me and preventing from accessing “medical” services thereafter, etc. Of course, there are TENS OF THOUSANDS of other filthy scumbags that also have been participating in the crimes, but the foul scumbags in filthy black robes have been committing the crimes against me “in the name of the ‘law’” when I was following the law to the tee and trying to use it as that ‘law’ directs.
I amassed more evidence than likely anyone else in a somewhat similar position, and have been posting some of it here, including audio recordings, “police” reports, and so on. I brilliantly used logic, observation, and analysis to document and preserve all evidence, concerning the crimes, committed against me and my family and point out the lies by the official criminals. I also bravely have been trying to communicate it to the public, while being silenced and oppressed by the nasty scumbags whom that evidence incriminates.
That was before I realized that there is no way to expose the criminals. To whom will I be exposing them if 99.9% of the scumbaggy public would gladly do the same (participate in document falsification, crime cover-ups, harming me, etc.) if given the chance? In fact, “the public” already does it by pretending to not understand what is going on, “unsee” the evidence, logic, and acuteness of the issues I raise. Empty demagoguery by the fraudulent controlled opposition is much safer and more soothing to the phonies that like to be manipulated.
You’re very “disappointed?”. “How do (you) know (that I am not) “part of the disinfo programme?” You can read the articles in which I post evidence (no one else does, and no one else posts any such documents, even when some nasty fraud breaks a “big” story to the moronic public) and urge people to acknowledge that the crimes are being committed under the guise of the “law.” Or do not read anything. At this point, it makes no difference to me. See above.
To be sure, I am categorically NOT accusing you of being disinfo. In fact, the opposite. But I believe you misunderstood. The issue is a *general*, philosophical one. But you seem to be obscurantist in that "there are endless lies, propaganda," etc. This is true. But it is not that we cannot know anything. That, mon ami, is the question of the hour, and we all need an answer to. But, I think you are taking my comment, rather than constructive, as accusatory, when it is anything but. So, to that end, I thank you for your work here, which had a lot of good, but I'm not interested in some internet "pissing match" where people misinterpret the innocuous intent of another poster, and on ad infinitim.
Best wishes in your work. You do truly appear to be one of the good guys, which is obvious from your intent; your work is important and valuable in a world full of lies; however, I don't wish to engage with back and forths like this; it also wastes your time as well.
Thank you for noticing! I haven’t given any of them any more of my time after the initial reads of their emotionally driven yakings. The materialistic marketing scumbags are loving their 15 seconds of fame 🤑🤮. More useful going outside to work, just cleaned up three downed trees, fire wood for next year 😻
"The materialistic marketing scumbags are loving their 15 seconds of fame. More useful going outside to work" - Why would they work? They are not just getting strong, sickening presence on the internet but millions of admirers and become multimillionaires. https://1dissident.substack.com/p/the-censorship-wars-engineered-by
Makes sense, why else is Substack being tolerated.
It's being "tolerated" to give the stage to a bunch of frauds (and make them filthy rich in the process!), and manufacture the false impression of "free speech," but most of my articles - the important ones that incriminate the scumbags - do not appear in search results (even when searched word-for-word). They are not being indexed, and that's only what is obvious. There are certainly processes in place to suppress them and make them unsearchable/unviewable by the general public. In other words, people who could be interested in reading my blog will never "randomly" find it. Substack claims that it indexes everything after a certain number of subscribers was reached but in reality only some of my general, unimportant articles do sometimes appear in search results.
You are at the pointy end, which we readers don't experience.
What do you think about Paul Alexander? He is really going after Malone right now. It is hard to see how they are both controlled opposition. Unless the CIA is just getting bored and wants to shake things up a bit...
Same. All those who amass thousands of "paid subscribers" are frauds. "Attacking" each other just part of the script.
Your article has become a classic by now. :)